The Covenant Dilemma: Political Theology, Fiscal Prioritization and Public Trust in Ghana’s National Cathedral Project

When a president's covenant with God influences a nation's budget, democracy is shaken. This comprehensive, interdisciplinary study examines the contentious National Cathedral Project in Ghana, addressing the "covenant dilemma" between spiritual imperatives and secular governance. We analyze how President Akufo-Addo's conceptualization of the cathedral as an irrevocable sacred pledge expanded personal piety into political theology and created budgetary exceptionalism. By passing constitutional oversight, over ₵339 million ($58 million) in public funds were diverted from urgent national priorities like maternity wards and rationed dialysis treatments. Parliamentary audits, Afrobarometer surveys showing a devastating 31-point drop in presidential trust directly linked to the project, and vibrant social media discourse reveal the corrosive effects: a profound legitimacy crisis fueled by stark perceptions of elitism (gleaming Italian marble cladding versus rationed dialysis), procedural opacity (sole-sourced contracts, exempted procurement), and deep-seated fiscal injustice. Ghana's example is significant because it illustrates the dangerous confrontation between sacralized administration and secular development imperatives in pluralistic democracies in Africa and beyond. This crisis holds democratic renewal seeds. We provide practical solutions: legislation like Sacred Projects Impact Assessments (SPIAs) requiring transparent justification against tangible needs, constitutional amendments requiring parliamentary ratification for large theological expenditures, and cost-triggered public referendums empowering citizens directly. With tools for theological accountability and restorative openness, this integrated strategy moves forward. This research provides an empirically rich, theoretically sophisticated, and deeply practical exploration of how states can navigate the treacherous terrain where sacred ambition collides with public need, transforming potential sites of division into foundations for renewed trust and a more just shared future