Department of Civil Engineering, Benghazi University, Benghazi, Libya.
World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 2025, 17(02), 438–443
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjaets.2025.17.2.1517
Received 06 October 2025; revised on 20 November 2025; accepted on 22 November 2025438
The Global Positioning System (GPS) delivers precise, continuous, and globally accessible positioning and timing information through satellite-based measurements. Nevertheless, relying on a single satellite constellation imposes limitations related to satellite availability and geometric distribution, which can adversely affect the reliability of positioning, particularly in environments where visibility is reduced or satellite geometry becomes suboptimal. This study examines the performance of static Precise Point Positioning (PPP) as a function of fixing time using the Canadian Spatial Reference System Precise Point Positioning (CSRS-PPP) service under two processing scenarios: GPS-only and GPS+GLONASS. The analysis was conducted under open-sky conditions where multipath effects are negligible. Dual-frequency GNSS data were collected from ten spatially well-distributed stations, each observed continuously for 24 hours. Static PPP solutions were generated for fixing intervals beginning at 1 hour and incrementally increasing to 24 hours. The 24-hour static PPP solution served as the reference for evaluating the accuracy and stability of all other solutions. The results show that utilizing GLONASS observations alongside GPS leads to notable improvements in solution reliability and overall positioning stability throughout the fixing intervals. These benefits are particularly clear during shorter observation durations, especially the first one hour where the absolute errors in N, H, 2D and 3D are reduced by (2.2, 3, 1.8 and 2.22 cm) with GPS+GLONASS, respectively. As for the Easting component, the absolute errors determined from the two constellations are very tiny and rounded about zero. The benefits of adding GLONASS to GPS can also be noted during the first several hours when PPP solutions are most sensitive to satellite geometry and convergence behavior. Although the enhancement in mean absolute positional accuracy becomes marginal for longer observation periods, the multi-constellation configuration significantly reduces the occurrence of outliers and decreases the dispersion of coordinate residuals across the Northing, Height, 2D, and 3D components. The results demonstrate that even under optimal open-sky conditions, where multipath is virtually absent, the integration of GLONASS contributes measurably to improving the robustness and reliability of Static PPP. In summary, although the improvement of integrating GLONASS with GPS in static PPP in the average absolute accuracy is marginal after long fixing time comparing to GPS-alone, the benefits are significant for the first a few hours, specially the first fixing hour where the 3D quality obtained via one-hour static dual-frequency PPP with GPS+GLONASS can be reached after 3 to 4 hours fixing time using GPS-alone.
GPS; GLONASS; Precise Point Positioning (PPP); CSRS-PPP; Static Positioning; Fixing Time
Get Your e Certificate of Publication using below link
Preview Article PDF
Mustafa M. Amami. Investigations into the quality of final-product dual-frequency static PPP over fixing time using CSRS-PPP free online service: GPS Vs. GPS + GLONASS. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 2025, 17(02), 438-443. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2025.17.2.1517.