Cross-disciplinary risk assessment models for integrated project delivery in large-scale civil engineering projects

Collaboration as a distinct activity exists across the planet only among a small number of actors because it requires deep diversity across long periods of definition while transcending traditional boundaries. The project actors unite continuously under integrated project delivery to work together from project start until completion through one unified delivery method. The concept applies to any moment starting from the beginning up to the end.
The research develops an analytical model to enhance current IPD risk evaluation systems by analyzing typical risk components needed for civil engineering projects. Organizations employed risk strategies across different disciplines to evaluate their response assessments via a framework which integrated technical systems with organizational structures and social elements according to recent research evaluations based on real case evidence.
Research uncovered essential differences between conventional models because these models did not have capability for observing disciplinary ties together with quick modifications to stakeholder operational mandates. The proposed framework succeeds in improving validity assessment of team risk communication processes while it develops resilient systems for better decision-making capabilities. The research adds value to ongoing talks about project delivery methods that investigate planning and project engineering and infrastructure project management association dynamics.