Solutions Architect, Enterprise Architecture, Anecca Ideas Corp, Toronto, Canada.
World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 2025, 17(01), 419–428
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjaets.2025.17.1.1416
Received on 15 September 2025; revised on 20 October 2025; accepted on 23 October 2025
The study presents a systematic literature review on fairness and bias in AI models. The review has primarily considered the types of bias, mitigation strategies, and evaluation metrics across domains such as recruitment, finance, and healthcare. The findings indicate that vulnerable populations are disproportionately affected by structural and technical sources of bias. However, the application of the metrics is inconsistent. Besides that, the mitigation strategies can be algorithmic regularization and data augmentation. Based on the review, the recommendation is to implement a multilevel approach that integrates governance, ethical, and technical measures. It can be instrumental in presenting transparency, accountability, and equity in AI systems.
AI Bias; Algorithmic Fairness; Mitigation Strategies; Fairness Metrics; Ethical AI; Systematic Literature Review
Preview Article PDF
Firoz Mohammed Ozman. Bias and fairness in AI models: Evidence from existing studies. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 2025, 17(01), 419-428. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2025.17.1.1416.